<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for 1st Byte Solutions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.1stbyte.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.1stbyte.com</link>
	<description>Company site for Greg Fischer { GregTheGeek }</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:12:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Is a hardware firewall really a software firewall anyway? by Ajithkumar CC</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/03/05/is-a-hardware-firewall-really-a-software-firewall-anyway/comment-page-1/#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajithkumar CC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/03/05/is-a-hardware-firewall-really-a-software-firewall-anyway/#comment-546</guid>
		<description>I appreciate the work that you have put in, in this page. Really good, also I wish to quote a few lines from this article in my site, I will give a link back to this article. Again.. it is really a good work.
Thanks
Ajithkumar</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate the work that you have put in, in this page. Really good, also I wish to quote a few lines from this article in my site, I will give a link back to this article. Again.. it is really a good work.<br />
Thanks<br />
Ajithkumar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Uninstalling VMWare tools when not running on a VMWare host by Rossoneri</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2009/07/21/uninstalling-vmware-tools-when-not-running-on-a-vmware-host/comment-page-1/#comment-544</link>
		<dc:creator>Rossoneri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 00:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/?p=177#comment-544</guid>
		<description>In windows, if you&#039;re facing any uninstallation issues, just use Revo Uninstaller http://www.revouninstaller.com/revo_uninstaller_free_download.html and you problems will be solved in few seconds

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In windows, if you&#8217;re facing any uninstallation issues, just use Revo Uninstaller <a href="http://www.revouninstaller.com/revo_uninstaller_free_download.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.revouninstaller.com/revo_uninstaller_free_download.html</a> and you problems will be solved in few seconds</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OpenSolaris ZFS rpool mirror by shaving mirror</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2009/08/08/opensolaris-zfs-rpool-mirror/comment-page-1/#comment-543</link>
		<dc:creator>shaving mirror</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 20:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/?p=189#comment-543</guid>
		<description>How does this tie to one of the other stories? Maybe I&#039;m blind... because I could&#039;ve been on a differnet website. lol Nevermind. At any rate, Later</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does this tie to one of the other stories? Maybe I&#8217;m blind&#8230; because I could&#8217;ve been on a differnet website. lol Nevermind. At any rate, Later</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Terminal Server without VPN for remote access by Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2005/03/20/terminal-server-without-vpn-for-remote-access/comment-page-1/#comment-541</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/2005/03/20/terminal-server-without-vpn-for-remote-access/#comment-541</guid>
		<description>Using a VPN would require you to essentially &quot;Dial-up&quot; a connection to your remote network. For example, you might be at home, and your work network has software on their end allowing you to connect to them.  Using that established connection, you basically become a remote node on their network. (that&#039;s one of the main reasons I don&#039;t like VPN&#039;s.)  

Using a remote access solution is different, although technically they are still creating some sort of a tunnel for you to securely connect. The difference is, you are not connected as a remote computer on the work network, you are only making a very specific secure connection to a specific port and specific computer. Not the same as a VPN tunnel, where you basically open up all ports and re-route your communications to the work net.  What I prefer is a program like GoToMyPC, or my favorite, LogMeIn.com.  They act as a third party to &quot;broker&quot; a connection from your home system to the work system. They do this in an outbound-connection only scenario.  What I mean by that is, you don&#039;t open ports up on a firewall and re-route traffic to certain internal systems. (another security hole, possibly)  In the LogMeIn setup, it makes an outbound connection without any inward firewall rules.  You connect at home to LogMeIN, they know where the work computers is, and they create the connections between the two for you.  IMHO, more secure that way.

Does that help?  I am not familiar with proxynetworks, but it looks like some similar connection methods as GoToMyPC or LogMeIn.

I might add too, that even though you would still create an inward connection with a firewall rule, I would still greatly prefer an SSH tunnel to another internal system.  Like creating your SSH connection with a port forward to RDP on your work desktop. (I wrote a program to do that actually!)  But since I&#039;ve discovered LogMeIn, I prefer that the most, it&#039;s just way to easy, no servers and firewalls to manage at the work end.  But no matter what, unless there is an actual practical requirement for using a VPN (and I can&#039;t think of one that SSH can&#039;t handle, in regards to remote access), I stay far away from VPN&#039;s.  That is, unless you desire to connect to remote networks, then sure, VPN sounds great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using a VPN would require you to essentially &#8220;Dial-up&#8221; a connection to your remote network. For example, you might be at home, and your work network has software on their end allowing you to connect to them.  Using that established connection, you basically become a remote node on their network. (that&#8217;s one of the main reasons I don&#8217;t like VPN&#8217;s.)  </p>
<p>Using a remote access solution is different, although technically they are still creating some sort of a tunnel for you to securely connect. The difference is, you are not connected as a remote computer on the work network, you are only making a very specific secure connection to a specific port and specific computer. Not the same as a VPN tunnel, where you basically open up all ports and re-route your communications to the work net.  What I prefer is a program like GoToMyPC, or my favorite, LogMeIn.com.  They act as a third party to &#8220;broker&#8221; a connection from your home system to the work system. They do this in an outbound-connection only scenario.  What I mean by that is, you don&#8217;t open ports up on a firewall and re-route traffic to certain internal systems. (another security hole, possibly)  In the LogMeIn setup, it makes an outbound connection without any inward firewall rules.  You connect at home to LogMeIN, they know where the work computers is, and they create the connections between the two for you.  IMHO, more secure that way.</p>
<p>Does that help?  I am not familiar with proxynetworks, but it looks like some similar connection methods as GoToMyPC or LogMeIn.</p>
<p>I might add too, that even though you would still create an inward connection with a firewall rule, I would still greatly prefer an SSH tunnel to another internal system.  Like creating your SSH connection with a port forward to RDP on your work desktop. (I wrote a program to do that actually!)  But since I&#8217;ve discovered LogMeIn, I prefer that the most, it&#8217;s just way to easy, no servers and firewalls to manage at the work end.  But no matter what, unless there is an actual practical requirement for using a VPN (and I can&#8217;t think of one that SSH can&#8217;t handle, in regards to remote access), I stay far away from VPN&#8217;s.  That is, unless you desire to connect to remote networks, then sure, VPN sounds great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Terminal Server without VPN for remote access by Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2005/03/20/terminal-server-without-vpn-for-remote-access/comment-page-1/#comment-540</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/2005/03/20/terminal-server-without-vpn-for-remote-access/#comment-540</guid>
		<description>Can you elaborate on what the differences are between using a VPN and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.proxynetworks.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;remote access&lt;/a&gt; software? What are the advantages/disadvantages of both...or is one just a more dressed up version of the other?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you elaborate on what the differences are between using a VPN and <a href="http://www.proxynetworks.com" rel="nofollow">remote access</a> software? What are the advantages/disadvantages of both&#8230;or is one just a more dressed up version of the other?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Configure Windows Server 2003 and 2008 w32tm commands on domain controller by Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2009/04/07/configure-windows-server-2003-and-2008-w32tm-commands-on-domain-controller/comment-page-1/#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 20:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/?p=151#comment-538</guid>
		<description>Is your system bios set to the correct date?  I&#039;d make sure that is set right first.  I don&#039;t know if dates are sync&#039;d with NTP, don&#039;t know enough about that to say for sure.  But it seems to me that if your date is wrong, you&#039;d want it set right in the bios anyway, then allow NTP to keep the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is your system bios set to the correct date?  I&#8217;d make sure that is set right first.  I don&#8217;t know if dates are sync&#8217;d with NTP, don&#8217;t know enough about that to say for sure.  But it seems to me that if your date is wrong, you&#8217;d want it set right in the bios anyway, then allow NTP to keep the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Configure Windows Server 2003 and 2008 w32tm commands on domain controller by Kane</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2009/04/07/configure-windows-server-2003-and-2008-w32tm-commands-on-domain-controller/comment-page-1/#comment-537</link>
		<dc:creator>Kane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/?p=151#comment-537</guid>
		<description>Hello.  When I run the commands only the time gets updated.  Is there anyway to have the date also sync.  Just like when you click on update for syncing the time and date in the clock properties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello.  When I run the commands only the time gets updated.  Is there anyway to have the date also sync.  Just like when you click on update for syncing the time and date in the clock properties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Chrome slow and laggy by Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2010/02/11/google-chrome-slow-and-laggy/comment-page-1/#comment-536</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 05:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/2010/02/11/google-chrome-slow-and-laggy/#comment-536</guid>
		<description>Ah, nice! Thanks for the tips! 

However, I did check, you can indeed disable &quot;access to&quot; IE in Windows 7, but that doesn&#039;t remove it from the computer.  I went to &quot;Set program access and computer defaults&quot; and unchecked the box that says, &quot;Enable access to this program.&quot;  This removed it from my desktop and start menu&#039;s. I then looked in Program Files, it was still in there and I could launch it.  So not REALLY removed, but a handy little tool to hide it from clients!  I&#039;ll do that and also add the IE icon to Firefox to trick them.

It&#039;s not that Firefox is necessarily more secure, because I can&#039;t give evidence to support that, but I can say, when my clients use that instead of IE, they have way less problems and bugs.

In your situation, your kind of stuck. You have to use sites that require you to use IE. Personally, I dislike IE so much, I just don&#039;t use software that require me to use IE.  I am not anti-MS, just anti-IE. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, nice! Thanks for the tips! </p>
<p>However, I did check, you can indeed disable &#8220;access to&#8221; IE in Windows 7, but that doesn&#8217;t remove it from the computer.  I went to &#8220;Set program access and computer defaults&#8221; and unchecked the box that says, &#8220;Enable access to this program.&#8221;  This removed it from my desktop and start menu&#8217;s. I then looked in Program Files, it was still in there and I could launch it.  So not REALLY removed, but a handy little tool to hide it from clients!  I&#8217;ll do that and also add the IE icon to Firefox to trick them.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not that Firefox is necessarily more secure, because I can&#8217;t give evidence to support that, but I can say, when my clients use that instead of IE, they have way less problems and bugs.</p>
<p>In your situation, your kind of stuck. You have to use sites that require you to use IE. Personally, I dislike IE so much, I just don&#8217;t use software that require me to use IE.  I am not anti-MS, just anti-IE. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Microsoft Security Essentials MsMpEng.exe using high CPU Time by Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2010/02/01/microsoft-security-essentials-msmpeng-exe-using-high-cpu-time/comment-page-1/#comment-535</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 05:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/2010/02/01/microsoft-security-essentials-msmpeng-exe-using-high-cpu-time/#comment-535</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing your comments!
I hope that works for you too, and let me know how it works.  The other day though, I ended up removing MSSE, because I kept having slow-downs on the system.  MsMpEng.exe wasn&#039;t hogging too much CPU, but it was still constantly working, and using around 20% and 120 or more Mb&#039;s or RAM.  I have a T9400 CPU and 4Gb&#039;s of RAM, why is MSSE using so much though, and causing my system to hover around 20% CPU usage?  I have it running on multiple systems, but just this bogs down my laptop.  

Now, another process I have running and using a lot of time is CrashPlanService.exe.  That&#039;s my backup program, which I LOVE!  and that hasn&#039;t caused me any issues before, for over a year now.  I even excluded that program and data files from MSSE in hopes that it wouldn&#039;t conflict.  So here&#039;s the thing, I removed MSSE, and guess what?  System hum&#039;s along with very little CPU time. Maybe jumps around at 2% to 5%, with tiny bumps to 10 or 15% once in a while.  That&#039;s kind of normal, and the system moves along much more quickly.  And yes, that&#039;s with my backup program still running.

Anyway, hope you have better luck!  I&#039;d rather just not use AV than deal with the slow downs.  Of course, I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve ever had a virus. Clean lots for my clients, but I know what *NOT* to do!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing your comments!<br />
I hope that works for you too, and let me know how it works.  The other day though, I ended up removing MSSE, because I kept having slow-downs on the system.  MsMpEng.exe wasn&#8217;t hogging too much CPU, but it was still constantly working, and using around 20% and 120 or more Mb&#8217;s or RAM.  I have a T9400 CPU and 4Gb&#8217;s of RAM, why is MSSE using so much though, and causing my system to hover around 20% CPU usage?  I have it running on multiple systems, but just this bogs down my laptop.  </p>
<p>Now, another process I have running and using a lot of time is CrashPlanService.exe.  That&#8217;s my backup program, which I LOVE!  and that hasn&#8217;t caused me any issues before, for over a year now.  I even excluded that program and data files from MSSE in hopes that it wouldn&#8217;t conflict.  So here&#8217;s the thing, I removed MSSE, and guess what?  System hum&#8217;s along with very little CPU time. Maybe jumps around at 2% to 5%, with tiny bumps to 10 or 15% once in a while.  That&#8217;s kind of normal, and the system moves along much more quickly.  And yes, that&#8217;s with my backup program still running.</p>
<p>Anyway, hope you have better luck!  I&#8217;d rather just not use AV than deal with the slow downs.  Of course, I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve ever had a virus. Clean lots for my clients, but I know what *NOT* to do!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Chrome slow and laggy by Hu</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2010/02/11/google-chrome-slow-and-laggy/comment-page-1/#comment-534</link>
		<dc:creator>Hu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/2010/02/11/google-chrome-slow-and-laggy/#comment-534</guid>
		<description>In windows 7, there is an option in the programs and features list to actually remove the browser completely from your system. This will delete the internet explorer executable from your computer. To reenable it, I&#039;m not entirely sure, but you might need the windows installation disk again. 

For internet explorer, you can possibly press WIN+R and type in regsvr32.dll or something like that, and it will reload the dll file for explorer. This was explained by Ed Bott on how to solve corruption with adobe flash activeX.

As for me, I use Chrome and Internet Explorer. I find Chrome perfect when I want some casual browsing necessary. I find Internet Explorer necessary purely for the various addons and tasks that only internet explorer can accomplish. Some of these include the onenote addon and other productivity ones. I also find it frustrating that Chrome doesn&#039;t give you an easy way to see what addons are being loaded and a quick way to disable them. 

As for firefox, I always believe that firefox is kind of in between. It is like Internet Explorer with the speed. It accomplishes neither productivity nor speed perfectly, as having two browsers that are more optimized for such tasks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In windows 7, there is an option in the programs and features list to actually remove the browser completely from your system. This will delete the internet explorer executable from your computer. To reenable it, I&#8217;m not entirely sure, but you might need the windows installation disk again. </p>
<p>For internet explorer, you can possibly press WIN+R and type in regsvr32.dll or something like that, and it will reload the dll file for explorer. This was explained by Ed Bott on how to solve corruption with adobe flash activeX.</p>
<p>As for me, I use Chrome and Internet Explorer. I find Chrome perfect when I want some casual browsing necessary. I find Internet Explorer necessary purely for the various addons and tasks that only internet explorer can accomplish. Some of these include the onenote addon and other productivity ones. I also find it frustrating that Chrome doesn&#8217;t give you an easy way to see what addons are being loaded and a quick way to disable them. </p>
<p>As for firefox, I always believe that firefox is kind of in between. It is like Internet Explorer with the speed. It accomplishes neither productivity nor speed perfectly, as having two browsers that are more optimized for such tasks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Microsoft Security Essentials MsMpEng.exe using high CPU Time by Hu</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2010/02/01/microsoft-security-essentials-msmpeng-exe-using-high-cpu-time/comment-page-1/#comment-533</link>
		<dc:creator>Hu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/2010/02/01/microsoft-security-essentials-msmpeng-exe-using-high-cpu-time/#comment-533</guid>
		<description>I tried your tweak that you mentioned and I really hope it will make a difference. Microsoft Security Essentials is a program with a good interface, however, the antimalware service executable is unforgivable. On a regular computer, it will hog the cpu when you are doing any task. Simply opening the explorer window will cause it to rise up to 6 percent and then back to zero. 

Perhaps, your tweak might work because the program is updating itself? If the program is simultaneously updating its definitions and scanning its definitions, it might cause more cpu problems. 

So far, there doesn&#039;t seem to be any issue with this tweak. I&#039;ll monitor the progress of the program for several days and conclude whether there is a difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried your tweak that you mentioned and I really hope it will make a difference. Microsoft Security Essentials is a program with a good interface, however, the antimalware service executable is unforgivable. On a regular computer, it will hog the cpu when you are doing any task. Simply opening the explorer window will cause it to rise up to 6 percent and then back to zero. </p>
<p>Perhaps, your tweak might work because the program is updating itself? If the program is simultaneously updating its definitions and scanning its definitions, it might cause more cpu problems. </p>
<p>So far, there doesn&#8217;t seem to be any issue with this tweak. I&#8217;ll monitor the progress of the program for several days and conclude whether there is a difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Join Windows 7 to Samba PDC on Ubuntu Jaunty by simon</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2009/05/31/join-windows-7-to-samba-pdc/comment-page-1/#comment-531</link>
		<dc:creator>simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/?p=163#comment-531</guid>
		<description>i&#039;ve succeeded to join win7 pc to samba (3.0.10), but i can&#039;t log in: eventid 3210. Anyone can help me, please??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;ve succeeded to join win7 pc to samba (3.0.10), but i can&#8217;t log in: eventid 3210. Anyone can help me, please??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The specified server cannot perform the requested operation by Scott Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2010/01/12/the-specified-server-cannot-perform-the-requested-operation/comment-page-1/#comment-530</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 14:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/2010/01/12/the-specified-server-cannot-perform-the-requested-operation/#comment-530</guid>
		<description>Many thanks! I have been chasing this error for a long time! Your fix worked!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks! I have been chasing this error for a long time! Your fix worked!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Join Windows 7 to Samba PDC on Ubuntu Jaunty by open2yb</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2009/05/31/join-windows-7-to-samba-pdc/comment-page-1/#comment-522</link>
		<dc:creator>open2yb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/?p=163#comment-522</guid>
		<description>Wallah!!!! it works!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wallah!!!! it works!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Join Windows 7 to Samba PDC on Ubuntu Jaunty by open2yb</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2009/05/31/join-windows-7-to-samba-pdc/comment-page-1/#comment-521</link>
		<dc:creator>open2yb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 21:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/?p=163#comment-521</guid>
		<description>I completely agree with Tim.. After the registry modifying, I have succeeded to join to samba domain, but can not logged in. Does samba upgrade solve the problem?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with Tim.. After the registry modifying, I have succeeded to join to samba domain, but can not logged in. Does samba upgrade solve the problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
