<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>1st Byte Solutions &#187; Internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.1stbyte.com/category/internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.1stbyte.com</link>
	<description>Company site for Greg Fischer { GregTheGeek }</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 07:52:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google Chrome slow and laggy</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2010/02/11/google-chrome-slow-and-laggy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.1stbyte.com/2010/02/11/google-chrome-slow-and-laggy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lastpass]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/2010/02/11/google-chrome-slow-and-laggy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, if you’re like me, you probably love Google Chrome browser.&#160; And although the latest version of Firefox (3.6) is much improved in speed, it launches fast and browses quick, I still like Chrome better now that I am used to it.&#160; Especially now that it’s got my two favorite extensions, Lastpass and mouse gestures.
Anyway, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.1stbyte.com/2010/02/11/google-chrome-slow-and-laggy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rootkit from fes.sk/files</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2010/02/09/rootkit-from-fes-skfiles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.1stbyte.com/2010/02/09/rootkit-from-fes-skfiles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antivirus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC Repair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/2010/02/09/rootkit-from-fes-skfiles/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had a client recently that had their browsers hijacked. Everything they typed in the browser ended up redirecting them to some test_s.php file at “www.fes.sk”.&#160; (Don’t open that, or you might end up with a virus!&#160; I just wanted people to find this in case it might help clean this bug off!)
Not sure what [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.1stbyte.com/2010/02/09/rootkit-from-fes-skfiles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ubuntu rndc.key dynamic DNS updates failing</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2009/05/12/ubuntu-rndckey-dynamic-dns-updates-failing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.1stbyte.com/2009/05/12/ubuntu-rndckey-dynamic-dns-updates-failing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 19:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dhcp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ubuntu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/?p=161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[there's a thing in Ubuntu called Apparmor. Never even heard of this. This is what was keeping the files from being written to by the bind daemon. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.1stbyte.com/2009/05/12/ubuntu-rndckey-dynamic-dns-updates-failing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exchange 2007 needs command line to set FQDN of external host name on Send Connector</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/08/22/exchange-2007-needs-command-line-to-set-fqdn-of-external-host-name-on-send-connector/</link>
		<comments>http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/08/22/exchange-2007-needs-command-line-to-set-fqdn-of-external-host-name-on-send-connector/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 19:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/08/22/exchange-2007-needs-command-line-to-set-fqdn-of-external-host-name-on-send-connector/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Exchange 2007, you have a nice little GUI to set your FQDN on your Send Connector.  (Mine is called Outbound, as shown below.)

You can see my FQDN, set under the Hub Transport/Send Connectors of the Exchange Management Console.


	
However, if you send mail out to an external address, you&#8217;ll notice in the headers that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/08/22/exchange-2007-needs-command-line-to-set-fqdn-of-external-host-name-on-send-connector/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Configure Word 2007 for Blogging to Wordpress 2.6</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/08/22/configure-word-2007-for-blogging-to-wordpress-26/</link>
		<comments>http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/08/22/configure-word-2007-for-blogging-to-wordpress-26/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 19:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/08/22/configure-word-2007-for-blogging-to-wordpress-26/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Had to spend a few minutes reminding myself how to configure this.  Easy as pie! Even works with images now!!! Yay!

While in a &#8220;New Blog&#8221; in Word 2007, click the Manage Accounts buton.  (A wizard will probably start the process the first time you do this, but here&#8217;s the manual way.)  This [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/08/22/configure-word-2007-for-blogging-to-wordpress-26/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New account does not appear in Global Address List but does in All Users</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/03/27/new-account-does-not-appear-in-global-address-list-but-does-in-all-users/</link>
		<comments>http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/03/27/new-account-does-not-appear-in-global-address-list-but-does-in-all-users/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/03/27/new-account-does-not-appear-in-global-address-list-but-does-in-all-users/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve run into this a few times, thought I&#8217;d record the solution for once so I remember it.

After adding a new user account, the user does not show up in Outlook&#8217;s Global Address List, but does show in All Users.  (If you click &#8220;To&#8221; in a new message, for example, and in the Select [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/03/27/new-account-does-not-appear-in-global-address-list-but-does-in-all-users/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IE7 fails to automatically authenticate with enable integrated windows authentication checked</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/03/15/ie7-fails-to-automatically-authenticate-with-enable-integrated-windows-authentication-checked/</link>
		<comments>http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/03/15/ie7-fails-to-automatically-authenticate-with-enable-integrated-windows-authentication-checked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 19:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/03/15/ie7-fails-to-automatically-authenticate-with-enable-integrated-windows-authentication-checked/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Internet Explorer 7, Tools, Internet Options, Advanced tab.  The checkbox for &#8220;enable integrated windows authentication&#8221; is very confusing.  You would think this means &#8220;just log me in with my windows credentials&#8221;, but no, there&#8217;s more to it than that.  And what I found was, it simply enables &#8220;Negotiate&#8221;.  It set&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/03/15/ie7-fails-to-automatically-authenticate-with-enable-integrated-windows-authentication-checked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Automatic Windows Authentication with Firefox network.automatic-ntlm-auth.trusted-uris</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/03/15/automatic-windows-authentication-with-firefox-networkautomatic-ntlm-authtrusted-uris/</link>
		<comments>http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/03/15/automatic-windows-authentication-with-firefox-networkautomatic-ntlm-authtrusted-uris/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 18:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/03/15/automatic-windows-authentication-with-firefox-networkautomatic-ntlm-authtrusted-uris/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the main reasons I don&#8217;t use Firefox in an Intranet environment, is due to the logon prompt from IIS Windows Authentication.  I keep having problems with IE7 on Vista losing the auto-NTLM auth, where it asks for my password, when it&#8217;s supposed to just log me in based on my domain logon! [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/03/15/automatic-windows-authentication-with-firefox-networkautomatic-ntlm-authtrusted-uris/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is a hardware firewall really a software firewall anyway?</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/03/05/is-a-hardware-firewall-really-a-software-firewall-anyway/</link>
		<comments>http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/03/05/is-a-hardware-firewall-really-a-software-firewall-anyway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 20:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/03/05/is-a-hardware-firewall-really-a-software-firewall-anyway/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love how people always say that a software firewall like IPCop is a &#8220;lesser&#8221; product than a hardware system.  I ran into one site speaking of Netsentron as a hardware solution.  I&#8217;d also include Endian Firewall and Untangle when we talk about a &#8220;linux based hardware firewall&#8221;.  Well here&#8217;s my thought. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/03/05/is-a-hardware-firewall-really-a-software-firewall-anyway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OMA Service Unavailable</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2007/12/17/oma-service-unavailable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.1stbyte.com/2007/12/17/oma-service-unavailable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 22:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/2007/12/17/oma-service-unavailable/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found a ton of help on Google for this &#8220;Service Unavailable&#8221; issue on the OMA virtual directory for Exchange 2003.  Unfortunately, this was not something readily available.  Several sites will explain the proper config for all the virtual folders in IIS, which you should obviously follow, but they don&#8217;t mention one little [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.1stbyte.com/2007/12/17/oma-service-unavailable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tell Firefox to show popups normally and not in a new tab</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2007/09/28/tell-firefox-to-show-popups-normally-and-not-in-a-new-tab/</link>
		<comments>http://www.1stbyte.com/2007/09/28/tell-firefox-to-show-popups-normally-and-not-in-a-new-tab/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/2007/09/28/tell-firefox-to-show-popups-normally-and-not-in-a-new-tab/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For some reason or other, Firefox does not have the option under the Tabs option items to &#8220;force links that open in new windows to open in:&#8221;.  I have Firefox 2.0.0.7 now, and I don&#8217;t have that under Tabs options.  But, if you open about:config in your address bar, you can change the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.1stbyte.com/2007/09/28/tell-firefox-to-show-popups-normally-and-not-in-a-new-tab/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
