<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>1st Byte Solutions &#187; Internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.1stbyte.com/category/internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.1stbyte.com</link>
	<description>Company site for Greg Fischer { GregTheGeek }</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:36:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Web site timeouts with PFSense firewall and Qwest DSL modem</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2011/10/25/web-site-timeouts-with-pfsense-firewall-and-qwest-dsl-modem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.1stbyte.com/2011/10/25/web-site-timeouts-with-pfsense-firewall-and-qwest-dsl-modem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 17:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FreeBSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DSL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firewall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/?p=414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Qwest / Centurylink DSL Web site timeouts, hangups, or failures while running a firewall or router with static IP addresses. Recently I setup the Qwest DSL service in my home. It worked great, but after a couple days I started to get hang ups and timeouts or hangups while browsing the web. Speed tests still [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.1stbyte.com/2011/10/25/web-site-timeouts-with-pfsense-firewall-and-qwest-dsl-modem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Remove MyWebSearch from my default search in Firefox</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2011/03/31/remove-mywebsearch-from-my-default-search-in-firefox/</link>
		<comments>http://www.1stbyte.com/2011/03/31/remove-mywebsearch-from-my-default-search-in-firefox/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 19:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antivirus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/?p=371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Somehow my wife got MyWebSearch loaded on my Windows 7 computer, which cleaned off fine, except for Firefox web searching! Every time I used the Awesome Bar to search, MyWebSearch showed the results. Easy fix&#8230;  go to &#8220;about:config&#8221; in Firefox by typing it in the URL bar.  In the Filter box, type &#8220;myweb&#8221;.  In my [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.1stbyte.com/2011/03/31/remove-mywebsearch-from-my-default-search-in-firefox/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unable to download Gmail from multiple POP3 clients using Outlook 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2011/03/31/unable-to-download-gmail-from-multiple-pop3-clients-using-outlook-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.1stbyte.com/2011/03/31/unable-to-download-gmail-from-multiple-pop3-clients-using-outlook-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 18:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outlook 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POP3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/?p=364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I ran into an issue with Outlook 2010 and Gmail POP3 access today. One of my clients had two computers he wanted his Gmail on, they both use POP3 to get the email. Problem he had was that only one computer would download the email, even with the setting to &#8220;leave messages on the server&#8221;. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.1stbyte.com/2011/03/31/unable-to-download-gmail-from-multiple-pop3-clients-using-outlook-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nmap network discovery port scan</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2011/03/10/nmap-network-discovery-port-scan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.1stbyte.com/2011/03/10/nmap-network-discovery-port-scan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nmap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ping Scan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port Scan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ubuntu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/?p=328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are like me, you don&#8217;t have time to run nmap scans and do other network maintenance. Running nmap is one of those really fun and useful tools that are easy to use, but since I rarely use it, I never remember the options.  Today was one of those situations where I needed to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.1stbyte.com/2011/03/10/nmap-network-discovery-port-scan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Netbook with Jolicloud vs Windows 7 vs Ubuntu Maverick vs Ubuntu Lucid</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2011/03/02/netbook-with-jolicloud-vs-windows-7-vs-ubuntu-maverick-vs-ubuntu-lucid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.1stbyte.com/2011/03/02/netbook-with-jolicloud-vs-windows-7-vs-ubuntu-maverick-vs-ubuntu-lucid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 17:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Install]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jolicloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lucid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maverick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/?p=316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I tested Windows 7, Jolicloud, Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick, and Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid on my new Dell Inspiron Mini 10 (1012) Netbook.  First let me say, Window 7 on this netbook is barely usable. If you wait for the OS to finish booting, which takes at least 5 minutes before all the background processes finish loading, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.1stbyte.com/2011/03/02/netbook-with-jolicloud-vs-windows-7-vs-ubuntu-maverick-vs-ubuntu-lucid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My idea for an open alternative to Facebook</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2010/05/05/my-idea-for-an-open-alternative-to-facebook/</link>
		<comments>http://www.1stbyte.com/2010/05/05/my-idea-for-an-open-alternative-to-facebook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 19:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/?p=258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am always getting ideas, and this might be a cool one. I want a new Facebook. I want to make my own version of it. Only, not centrally controlled, and not a direct single-place-to-go site to be social. Why? Because I foresee a downfall. And because Facebook, if its not already there, is becoming [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.1stbyte.com/2010/05/05/my-idea-for-an-open-alternative-to-facebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Chrome slow and laggy</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2010/02/11/google-chrome-slow-and-laggy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.1stbyte.com/2010/02/11/google-chrome-slow-and-laggy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lastpass]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/2010/02/11/google-chrome-slow-and-laggy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, if you’re like me, you probably love Google Chrome browser.&#160; And although the latest version of Firefox (3.6) is much improved in speed, it launches fast and browses quick, I still like Chrome better now that I am used to it.&#160; Especially now that it’s got my two favorite extensions, Lastpass and mouse gestures. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.1stbyte.com/2010/02/11/google-chrome-slow-and-laggy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rootkit from fes.sk/files</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2010/02/09/rootkit-from-fes-skfiles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.1stbyte.com/2010/02/09/rootkit-from-fes-skfiles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antivirus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC Repair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/2010/02/09/rootkit-from-fes-skfiles/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had a client recently that had their browsers hijacked. Everything they typed in the browser ended up redirecting them to some test_s.php file at “www.fes.sk”.&#160; (Don’t open that, or you might end up with a virus!&#160; I just wanted people to find this in case it might help clean this bug off!) Not sure [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.1stbyte.com/2010/02/09/rootkit-from-fes-skfiles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ubuntu rndc.key dynamic DNS updates failing</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2009/05/12/ubuntu-rndckey-dynamic-dns-updates-failing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.1stbyte.com/2009/05/12/ubuntu-rndckey-dynamic-dns-updates-failing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 19:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dhcp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ubuntu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/?p=161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[there's a thing in Ubuntu called Apparmor. Never even heard of this. This is what was keeping the files from being written to by the bind daemon. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.1stbyte.com/2009/05/12/ubuntu-rndckey-dynamic-dns-updates-failing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exchange 2007 needs command line to set FQDN of external host name on Send Connector</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/08/22/exchange-2007-needs-command-line-to-set-fqdn-of-external-host-name-on-send-connector/</link>
		<comments>http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/08/22/exchange-2007-needs-command-line-to-set-fqdn-of-external-host-name-on-send-connector/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 19:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/08/22/exchange-2007-needs-command-line-to-set-fqdn-of-external-host-name-on-send-connector/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Exchange 2007, you have a nice little GUI to set your FQDN on your Send Connector. (Mine is called Outbound, as shown below.) You can see my FQDN, set under the Hub Transport/Send Connectors of the Exchange Management Console. However, if you send mail out to an external address, you&#8217;ll notice in the headers [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/08/22/exchange-2007-needs-command-line-to-set-fqdn-of-external-host-name-on-send-connector/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Configure Word 2007 for Blogging to WordPress 2.6</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/08/22/configure-word-2007-for-blogging-to-wordpress-26/</link>
		<comments>http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/08/22/configure-word-2007-for-blogging-to-wordpress-26/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 19:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/08/22/configure-word-2007-for-blogging-to-wordpress-26/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Had to spend a few minutes reminding myself how to configure this. Easy as pie! Even works with images now!!! Yay! While in a &#8220;New Blog&#8221; in Word 2007, click the Manage Accounts buton. (A wizard will probably start the process the first time you do this, but here&#8217;s the manual way.) This assumes you [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/08/22/configure-word-2007-for-blogging-to-wordpress-26/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New account does not appear in Global Address List but does in All Users</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/03/27/new-account-does-not-appear-in-global-address-list-but-does-in-all-users/</link>
		<comments>http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/03/27/new-account-does-not-appear-in-global-address-list-but-does-in-all-users/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/03/27/new-account-does-not-appear-in-global-address-list-but-does-in-all-users/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve run into this a few times, thought I&#8217;d record the solution for once so I remember it. After adding a new user account, the user does not show up in Outlook&#8217;s Global Address List, but does show in All Users. (If you click &#8220;To&#8221; in a new message, for example, and in the Select [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/03/27/new-account-does-not-appear-in-global-address-list-but-does-in-all-users/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IE7 fails to automatically authenticate with enable integrated windows authentication checked</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/03/15/ie7-fails-to-automatically-authenticate-with-enable-integrated-windows-authentication-checked/</link>
		<comments>http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/03/15/ie7-fails-to-automatically-authenticate-with-enable-integrated-windows-authentication-checked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 19:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/03/15/ie7-fails-to-automatically-authenticate-with-enable-integrated-windows-authentication-checked/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Internet Explorer 7, Tools, Internet Options, Advanced tab. The checkbox for &#8220;enable integrated windows authentication&#8221; is very confusing. You would think this means &#8220;just log me in with my windows credentials&#8221;, but no, there&#8217;s more to it than that. And what I found was, it simply enables &#8220;Negotiate&#8221;. It set&#8217;s this registry key to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/03/15/ie7-fails-to-automatically-authenticate-with-enable-integrated-windows-authentication-checked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Automatic Windows Authentication with Firefox network.automatic-ntlm-auth.trusted-uris</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/03/15/automatic-windows-authentication-with-firefox-networkautomatic-ntlm-authtrusted-uris/</link>
		<comments>http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/03/15/automatic-windows-authentication-with-firefox-networkautomatic-ntlm-authtrusted-uris/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 18:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/03/15/automatic-windows-authentication-with-firefox-networkautomatic-ntlm-authtrusted-uris/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the main reasons I don&#8217;t use Firefox in an Intranet environment, is due to the logon prompt from IIS Windows Authentication. I keep having problems with IE7 on Vista losing the auto-NTLM auth, where it asks for my password, when it&#8217;s supposed to just log me in based on my domain logon! ARgh! [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/03/15/automatic-windows-authentication-with-firefox-networkautomatic-ntlm-authtrusted-uris/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is a hardware firewall really a software firewall anyway?</title>
		<link>http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/03/05/is-a-hardware-firewall-really-a-software-firewall-anyway/</link>
		<comments>http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/03/05/is-a-hardware-firewall-really-a-software-firewall-anyway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 20:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/03/05/is-a-hardware-firewall-really-a-software-firewall-anyway/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love how people always say that a software firewall like IPCop is a &#8220;lesser&#8221; product than a hardware system. I ran into one site speaking of Netsentron as a hardware solution. I&#8217;d also include Endian Firewall and Untangle when we talk about a &#8220;linux based hardware firewall&#8221;. Well here&#8217;s my thought. These systems offer [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.1stbyte.com/2008/03/05/is-a-hardware-firewall-really-a-software-firewall-anyway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

